"Those who command their labor vectors will always strive for greater efficiency in their maintenance and in their performance. The ideal outcome is modifying the labor vector's behavior on command while completely eliminating risks to systemic stability. The problem, then, is the very nature of the labor vectors themselves. Limitations in the labor vectors neurology, most specifically, the mechanisms surrounding unsynchronized emotional narratives, stand in the way of future efficiency. The emotional narrative of the labor vector is the biggest source of inefficiency for the execution of resource extraction. Therefore, the elimination of emotion, and then later the synthesis of new emotions, through advanced genetic engineering, is essential for future efficiency and will completely negate the nuclear risk associated with the previous control paradigm. It is difficult to clamor for war due to economic collapse if you simply do not have the neurological facilities for rage, anger, and aggression."
|It's not the future until we have|
flying cars, no matter how many
brown people get blown up
by semi-autonomous aircraft.
You are actually responding in real-time to a theory you feel angry about in real-time from the comfort of your environs. Don't talk to me about too much sci-fi, you fucking stereotypical American.
The ideal condition for any vector commander with a bird's eye view is called the steady state. The premise is simple. You wake up and yesterday is just like today. No extraordinary effort is needed to preserve anything. No anomalous behavior destabilizes affairs. Reality persists by itself and consequences do not matter. Your entire reality is steady, stable, and reliable. You no longer focus on the means and, instead, can spend all of your energy focused on the ends. This fantasy is the anchor in which all economic theory is founded on achieving. This outcome is where all vector commanders find themselves hurdling towards at one point or another.
|History's first vector commander,|
Alexander III of Macedonia.
Production capability has been mastered over the span of two hundred years. With each new technology, a new efficiency is achieved and more of something can be manufactured at faster speeds. Consumer demands, however, are not as mathematically predictable. A sloppy approximation of emotion, manufactured dichotomy, and centrally controlled narratives are the rule of the day when shaping consumer demands. (Marketing is nothing more than primitive psychologists lobbing grenades into a crowd.) As information technology becomes more pronounced, crafting demand is less of an exercise in carpet bombing and more of a sniper round. However, even when refined to the optimum, this approach has a peak efficiency that is ultimately hindered on communication problems caused by individual emotional context.
|Marx knew that, in order to achieve|
industrial equilibrium, the nations of the
earth would have to construct a big
enough stick to beat the moon with.
In a pure globalist state where all consumer markets have been liberalized and synchronized, marketing techniques are at an optimum, and productivity can be tightly managed, this problem of human emotional context becomes more magnified than ever before as it is becomes the final barrier to the industrial equilibrium sought after by the steady state. If the aggregate demand slumps and central economic dogma cannot kick start it back into gear, the Broken Window Model will be dragged out once more, but this time, it will be with nuclear consequences.
To abandon five thousand years of technological mastery will not occur. It's not even an option on the fucking table. No one is willfully going back to prolonged slave labor and dying of tooth decay at the age of twenty. (I'm kidding, look at these classy misanthropes.) It will be far more convenient (and economically feasible) to use the momentum of our current technological pace to master genetic engineering and alter human emotions for vector commander needs from the genome up. I'm not talking everyone taking a pill. I mean human hybrids being born without the neurological capacity for specific emotions. Advanced hybrids will enjoy the experience of synthetic emotions. The desired ends of such tinkering will be determined, as always, by the vector commanders.
Human emotion must be rendered into a purely plastic state so that it can be synchronized more efficiently to meet the needs of productive capability. This outcome is the unconscious direction authority has been yearning towards for thousands of years and, in my lifetime (and maybe even with my indirect help) the reoccurring tyrants will get the physical manifestation of what they've always wanted.
In the next article, I will discuss the means that will serve as the foundation for this outcome.